Radeon RX 570 vs. RX 580 vs. GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs. GTX 1060 6GB

It's time to retest the Radeon RX 570 (we only did it last week) because we didn't seem to get it right the first time. Many were surprised that the RX 570 is currently cheaper than the GTX 1050 Ti. Admittedly, it is very surprising considering that the RX 570 runs everywhere on the affordable GeForce, but that's the current situation and maybe we would have should address the comparison as soon as we discover this practical anomaly.

During the mining craze, it was really difficult to find affordable Radeons. That's why we chose the 3 GB GTX 1060 because the limited memory buffer made it unusable for most mining operations. This meant that pricing remained stable and was therefore the mid-range option with the best price-performance ratio for some time.

Today, however, the GTX 1060 3 GB is often around $ 200. The RX 570 costs between $ 150 and $ 170, which corresponds to the GTX 1050 Ti (~ $ 170), although it was recently destroyed in a direct comparison with the RX 570. Perhaps the RX 580 is the only real competition for the RX 570, an 8 GB PowerColor model that is currently sold for only $ 180. Most models cost between $ 200 and $ 210. After all, the full 6GB 1060 usually costs $ 240-250.

We're going to compete against all of these mainstream GPUs in 36 games at 1080p and 1440p to see which ones are ahead in terms of performance and value. Our test bench for this benchmark session consisted of a Core i9-9900K with 5 GHz and 32 GB DDR4-3200 memory. The drivers we used were Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.1.1 for the Radeon GPUs and Game Ready 417.35 WHQL for the GeForce GPUs.


It should be noted in all graphics that graphics cards are not sorted from the fastest to the slowest. Instead, we've kept the order statically so that it's easier to follow.

Starting with Shadow of the Tomb Raider, we see that the RX 570 can outperform the GTX 1060 3 GB, even though the scope is small. The RX 580 is now a good deal faster than the 6 GB 1060 and offers 9% more frames at 1080p.

Strange Brigade is a well-optimized game and although it is a title sponsored by AMD, it works very well with Nvidia hardware. Here the RX 570 outperformed both the 3 GB GTX 1060 and the 6 GB model, while the 1050 Ti lagged a mile behind. The RX 570 was only 6% slower than the 580.

Battlefield V is another title where these affordable Radeon GPUs hold their own against the competition. The RX 580 flashed the 6 GB 1060, while the RX 570 only surpassed the 3 GB 1060 with 1080p, but struck it quite comfortably with 1440p. The 570 was basically at the level of the 6GB 1060.

Sniper Elite 4 is another game where the Radeon GPUs do very well. Here the RX 570 achieved the 1% low performance of the 3 GB 1060, while it convincingly exceeded the average frame rate at 1080p.

The RX 580 also beat the 6 GB 1060 with a comfortable lead and was even 18% faster than the 570 at 1080p.

Monster Hunter World performance is competitive between the RX 570, 580 and GTX 1060. The 3 GB 1060 outperforms the RX 570, while the RX 580 outperforms the 6 GB 1060, but the RX 570 can hold its own very well.

At 1080p we see that AMD GPUs in Warframe have slightly better frame time performance, although the 1060s provided the best average frame rate performance. The frame time performance for the GeForce GPUs at 1440p improves, and here the 3 GB 1060 clearly outperforms the RX 570.

The performance of Just Cause 4 was also scarce. Here the RX 570 and GTX 1060 were 3 GB neck to neck, while the RX 580 was 7% faster than the 6 GB 1060 at the average frame rate.

Grand Theft Auto V gave the RX 570 the smallest victory over the GTX 1050 Ti, so it's no surprise that the GTX 1060 drives up here. The 3 GB 1060 beat the RX 580, although the frame time performance was almost the same. In other words, GeForce cards are undoubtedly the better choice for playing GTA V.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey is another title that doesn't work as well with AMD hardware, even though it's a title sponsored by AMD. The RX 580 is surpassed by the 6 GB 1060, although the 3 GB version of the card struggles with some pretty ugly results at 1440p and 1080p frame rates.

Hitman 2's results are very competitive. Here the 3 GB 1060 with 1080p was ahead of the RX 570, although it fell behind with 1440p. The RX 580 beat the 6 GB 1060 at both resolutions.

Radeon GPUs always did well in Rainbow Six Siege, and here we see the RX 580 destroy the 6 GB GTX 1060, although the 3 GB model does very well against the RX 570. Now we should note that the ultra quality preset uses a standard rendering scale of 50, not 50%, only 50, which means that 1920×1080 becomes 1360×764. The game uses up-scaling so that you get an image that rescales to the output resolution.

We tested with these settings as this is the default mode, but many Rainbow Six Siege players have complained that our frame rates were too high without realizing that they had configured these options manually and that the maximum in-game preset actually rendering renders almost 30% lower than the output resolution. Now we choose the Ultra preset and adjust the rendering scale to 100 each time.

This makes the game very hungry for VRAM. At 1080p, the game requires at least 6.4 GB of memory, so the 3 GB 1060 and 4 GB RX 570 are hit pretty hard. It's not often that the 8 GB RX 580 at 1080p offers over 40% more power than the 4 GB RX 570, but this is the case with these settings. In the end, the RX 580 easily outperforms the 6 GB 1060, while the 3 GB 1060 and RX 570 are comparable in the two resolutions tested.

The last game we will discuss the results for is World of Tanks. All GPUs with 1080p performed well here. Both GTX 1060 models easily beat the Radeon competition, especially at 1080p. For example, the 3 GB 1060 was 22% faster than the RX 570. This margin was reduced to 16% at 1440p, which is still a solid gain for Nvidia.

Service summary

In our recent Radeon RX 570 test, we found that this budget GPU was 43% faster on average than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. This metric was the result of calculating the percentage difference per game and then averaging those numbers over the number of games tested.

Since we are comparing not two but five GPUs this time, we will do our calculations a little differently. Instead, we simply take the fps data from all games and average these numbers. This gives the RX 570 a 41% lead over the GTX 1050 Ti. As you can see, there is a difference, but the result should be the same.

The 3 GB GTX 1060 was on average 4% faster than the RX 570 in the 36 games tested, which gave it an advantage of 3 fps. Then we see another 14% leap in performance on the RX 580 8GB and GTX 1060 6GB, both of which averaged 82 games per second in the 36-game example.

This made the 8 GB RX 580 on average 19% faster than the 4 GB RX 570 and this makes sense since the 580 packs offer 13% more cores with an advantage of 8% core clock speed, and we've seen some cases where that too the double VRAM was beneficial.

Before proceeding, here is a brief overview of how the RX 570 compares to the other GPUs tested per game. In our previous article, we saw how the GTX 1050 Ti dominated in all 36 games, and as I said before, when calculating the percentage difference per game due to rounding, we achieved a performance advantage of 43% in favor of the RX 570 Error .

The RX 570 was 4% slower on average than the GTX 1060 3GB, and the table below clearly shows where the Radeon GPU outperformed the 3GB 1060 and where the GeForce GPU outperformed.

The RX 570 achieved great victories in Forza Horizon 4 and Hitman, while losing with a convincing lead in Total War Saga, GTA V and Fortnite.

As can be expected, the performance deficit compared to the 6 GB GTX 1060 …

In a mainstream comparison between Radeon and Radeon, the RX 580 was on average 14% slower than the RX 570.

Right, that's how they stack up in a variety of games and these are surely the margins you can normally expect. The only question left to be answered is how they stack up in terms of value. To answer this question, we check the cost per frame.

Find the best value: cost per frame

In order to compile the costs per outline diagram, we used all US dollar amounts from Newegg lists. We ignored the absolute lowest price if there was a single model available at that price, which we hope will be the most accurate and fairest representation of the current prices.

At a current retail price of $ 150, the Radeon RX 570 only costs $ 2.17 per frame, but even if we use the $ 170 MSRP, it's only $ 2.46, which is 11 % cheaper than the 3 GB GTX 1060.

The RX 580 is also an exceptional value at the current price of $ 190. It's only 6% more expensive per frame than the RX 570 and impressive 21% cheaper than the GeForce GTX 1060 6GB. At the bottom of the graphic we can see that the GTX 1050 Ti does not offer a good value at the current offer price. At $ 170 per frame, it's almost 60% more expensive than the RX 570, so this GPU should make sense if it sells closer to $ 140.

Taking these numbers into account (and the fact that good FreeSync monitors should suddenly become very popular with gamers), we find that it is difficult to exceed the $ 150 RX if you have less than $ 200 Would like to spend dollars on a graphics card 570.

Nvidia has announced that the GTX 10 series cards will be out of stock soon (in a few weeks). However, for this to be possible in the mainstream, a form of replacement GPUs must be introduced. At the moment we would avoid the 3 GB GTX 1060 as the limited VRAM buffer is already a problem and will be a bigger problem with many upcoming titles even at 1080p. Even 4 GB are right on the edge. So if you can expand the budget, we recommend that you buy an 8 GB RX 580.

Purchasing links:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *