Intel Core i7-1165G7 Evaluation: Tiger Lake Inside

It's time to check out Intel's new Tiger Lake mobile CPUs, starting with the Core i7-1165G7, a part mostly found in the mainstream to high-end ultraportables. Intel announced Tiger Lake months ago and systems are now available with the new chips.

Tiger Lake and the Core i7-1165G7 are a revamp of Intel's mobile offerings, especially Ice Lake, which wasn't great. With AMD entering the laptop market with Ryzen 4000 in 2020, Tiger Lake is Intel's great response that is filled with new features.

The key to this new series is Intel's new 10nm SuperFin process. 10nm was problematic for Intel to say the least, but for a low-power mobile CPU, 10nm SuperFin appears to be up to the task for next-generation CPU architectures. On this node, Intel can significantly increase both the CPU and GPU clock speeds compared to 10 nm Ice Lake products with the same performance class. This offers most of the performance improvements that the Core i7-1165G7 offers over the i7-1065G7 (yes, we don't love the names either).

The design of the CPU core has also been slightly updated and switched from Sunny Cove to Willow Cove. In particular, the cache size has increased from 8MB L3 on top-end quad cores to 12MB. We also get a much larger GPU design based on the Intel Xe architecture, 96 execution units, memory support for higher frequencies, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 4.0, and better hardware acceleration for video encoding and decoding.

The Core i7-1165G7 we are reviewing is Intel's second largest and most widely used Tiger Lake UP3 processor. UP3 was previously referred to as the U series in the power range of ~ 15 W. It contains four Willow Cove CPU cores and eight threads. This is a deficit compared to the 8-core design from AMD, which is currently offered in this performance class. However, Intel tries to compensate for this with high clock rates.

With this generation, Intel changed the way in which key metrics such as the base clock rate are reported. Instead, we have specified this value for configurations with just 28W and 12W instead of the standard 15W configurations. There's a 2.8 GHz base at 28W, which is much higher than the 1.50 GHz base that the Ice Lake Core i7-1065G7 offers at 25W. However, the fundamental frequency gain is much lower at 12 W and only 200 MHz higher than before.

Intel UP3 graphic Cores / threads Graphic (EUs) Cache Workspace Base frequency (GHz) Max. Single core (GHz) Max All Core (GHz) Graphics Max (GHz)
Core i7-1185G7 Iris Xe 4/8 96 12 MB 12-28W 3.0 4.8 4.3 1.35
Core i7-1165G7 Iris Xe 4/8 96 12 MB 12-28W 2.8 4.7 4.1 1.30
Core i5-1135G7 Iris Xe 4/8 80 8 MB 12-28W 2.4 4.2 3.8 1.30
Core i3-1125G4 UHD 4/8 48 8 MB 12-28W 2.0 3.7 3.3 1.25
Core i3-1115G4 UHD 2/4 48 6 MB 12-28W 3.0 4.1 4.1 1.25

Ice Lake's rather restrictive upper frequency limit has been lifted thanks to 10 nm SuperFin. Boost clocks with the 1165G7 now reach a peak performance of 4.7 GHz on a single thread, compared to a rather pathetic 3.9 GHz compared to the 1065G7.

The Tiger Lake GPU has been updated from a Gen11 design to Xe-LP. This brings a number of improvements, including 96 execution units compared to 64 before and a frequency increase of a maximum of 1.1 to 1.3 GHz. As with the CPU core, Intel is promoting higher frequencies at all voltages with the new Xe design.

These are the basics of the new Core i7-1165G7. This is not a simple frequency bump from 100 to 200 MHz on existing architectures like we have had for years in the Skylake era. This is a major overhaul. Unfortunately, the name wasn't treated alike: The Core i7-1165G7 is currently still one of the worst-named CPUs in the industry.

For today's test, we'll go through both productivity and gaming benchmarks and compare the 1165G7 with 15W and 28W power to other U-series mobile CPUs like Ryzen, Ice Lake, Comet Lake, etc. There's a lot of benchmarking to get by so buckle up.

We are happy to announce that we are basing this review on four different i7-1165G7 laptops. This gives us the most comprehensive data we had for this type of launch. So let's go through the test systems …

Tiger Lake Powered Laptops

First up, we have the new Intel NUC M15 branded Schenker Vision 15. This is Intel's 15-inch Tiger Lake reference design that they offer OEMs, which is pretty good overall with this MacBook aesthetic. The 1165G7 runs at 28W or higher, although we left it at 28W in the standard power profile. 16 GB of LPDDR4X memory and sufficient cooling, which keeps it quiet, and a 1080p display.

The XMG Core 14 is a powerful 14-inch portable system that includes both an 1165G7 up to 28W and a discrete GeForce GTX 1650 GPU. 32 GB two-channel DDR4-3200 memory as well as a Samsung SSD with 512 GB and a 1080p display. It's not the slimmest system out there, but this thing has that form factor with that GPU inside.

Then we come to the Dell Inspiron 14 7000. The Core i7-1165G7 has an output of up to 20 W, although we are using the 15 W power profile for this test. It also features GeForce MX350 discrete graphics, 16GB of LPDDR4X memory, and a 2560 x 1600 display. We really like this system because it is superbly built and portable.

Finally, we have the Schenker Via 14, a portability-oriented 14-inch laptop that also offers the i7-1165G7 with up to 20 W. However, we are using the 15 W power profile for this test. 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-3200 memory, a 1080p display, and a slim body that's perfect for a laptop that relies entirely on integrated graphics.

Test Notes

The reason we chose these performance profiles specifically for these laptops, even if in some cases they may not be the highest profile available, is to give us the best apple-to-apple comparisons with chips we've already tested , usually at 15W or 25W.

As mentioned earlier, the performance tier for laptop form factors is critical because, while a higher performance tier provides better performance, it also requires more cooling, so either a thicker or louder design is required. We don't think it's fair to compare a 15W CPU in a slim and lightweight case with limited cooling to a beefier design with a 28W discrete GPU. However, we've kept Boost configurations by default, with all of these Tiger Lake systems boosting between 35 and 50W for different periods of time, sometimes several minutes.

The results you see in the charts below are an average of the benchmark runs on laptops with the same configuration. We tested several laptops for almost all of the CPUs in the charts. This should give you a general overview of performance. OEMs can configure their laptops however they want, so depending on the laptop they buy, they may see a 5% difference to average results for the same performance. We have seen this in general.

When you think of an ultra-thin laptop, the 15W numbers match what you'll see better, while those buying more premium and larger designs should take a closer look at the 25W numbers.

Benchmarks

Let's get to benchmarking and start with Cinebench R20. Since this is a multithreaded workload, this isn't a strong part of Intel's Tiger Lake platform as it only has four cores compared to 6 and 8 cores for most AMD Ryzen models. The 1165G7 is therefore not very competitive in the higher performance class and is 30% behind the Ryzen 7 4700U and 45% behind the Ryzen 7 4800U. At 15 W these margins are larger.

However, compared to other Intel processors, there is some good news here. With 28 W compared to 25 W for the 1065G7, the new Tiger Lake design from Intel is 24 percent faster thanks to significantly higher multi-core clock rates.

At 15 W, the gains are not that great as the 1165G7 has a 12% lead. It appears that 10nm SuperFin plays much better at 28W than at 15W, which would explain Intel's strong focus on the higher-powered configuration. Ultimately, however, the 1165G7 cannot keep up with the Ryzen 5 4500U in terms of multithreaded performance in this benchmark.

While Tiger Lake's Cinebench MT performance isn't impressive, the opposite is true for single-thread. The 1165G7 is by far the fastest mobile CPU we've tested for single-thread performance, and vastly outperforms all other designs.

At 28 W, the Core i7-1165G7 is 23% faster than the Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD's fastest Renoir design. However, to step up to 4.8 GHz, a single Willow Cove CPU core actually consumes more than 15W of power in my tests, around the 20-22W mark. That is why Tiger Lake is configured with its standard single thread with 15 W TDP. The performance drops outside the boost period.

This is in contrast to AMD's design, which allows a single core to run under 15W, so Ryzen sees negligible performance degradation at 15W. The end result is that the 1165G7 is 23% faster than the 4800U at higher power, but only 15% faster at 15W.

Overall, the single-thread performance is still very impressive and the ability to step up to 4.8 GHz gives Intel a strong win. It's pretty uncommon for a U-series processor to outperform any H-series chip, and a Tiger Lake laptop might be your best bet if you're relying on a one-threaded productivity workload.

Next up is Handbrake, which tests the CPU coding over an extended period of time. Since this is a multithreaded test, Tiger Lake isn't particularly impressive and can't beat the Ryzen 5 4500U. While the 1165G7 is faster than the 1065G7 – 16% faster at 28W and 8% faster at 15W – that's nowhere near the amount required to bridge the gap to Ryzen with just a quad-core design. The Ryzen 7 4800U is particularly impressive here at 15 W and absolutely destroys the 1165G7.

The situation is similar with the Blender CPU coding, in which Tiger Lake again clearly lags behind Renoir in terms of multi-core performance. While the 1165G7 benefits from a healthy performance increase of 21 percent over the 1065G7 at 28 W, this is not enough to outperform the 15 W Ryzen 5 4500U. This shows that Intel's quad-core design isn't exactly ideal for the efficiency of these workloads.

For GCC compilation in Cygwin, the Core i7-1165G7 is not a particularly good choice, as the compilation times are only slightly better than the Core i7-1065G7. This means that when it comes to extensive code compilation work, Tiger Lake again lags far behind AMD's Ryzen processors, although I suspect this will vary depending on the compilation. The more single-threading, the better the results for Tiger Lake. However, once multithreading comes into play, the 1165G7 falls behind.

On the Chromium compilation, this is a slightly better story as the Core i7-1165G7 is at least competitive with the Ryzen 5 4500U at 25W and 28W, but is still outdone by AMD's high-end Zen 2 APUs.

The benchmark built into MATLAB uses a combination of multi-threaded, single-threaded and memory-intensive functions. The Core i7-1165G7 is a very strong competitor here, displacing the 1065G7 by 17% at 28 W and by 8% at 15 W, making it the fastest processor in the U series. The additional frequency offered to Tiger Lake enables it to recapture AMD's performance crown, which Ice Lake has barely surpassed at the highest end with its Renoir configuration.

Next we have our Excel large number calculation test which, like many functions in Excel, uses multithreading and hits the cache pretty hard. With a CPU with only four cores, the Core i7-1165G7 exceeds its weight, exceeds the Ryzen 5 Pro 4650U with six cores and twelve threads and corresponds to the Ryzen 7 4700U in the higher performance class. While the 1165G7 is not the fastest CPU in this range that the 4800U can claim, it is a good mobile processor for Excel workloads.

When Renoir was released, AMD took a victory in the PCMark 10 Essentials test, especially with its high-end Ryzen 7 APUs. In this workload, which includes loading apps, light web surfing, and video conferencing, the i7-1165G7 offers 12 percent more performance than parts of the previous generation, allowing it to adapt the Ryzen 7 4800U for basic workloads. Given that the 4800U is quite rare in the market, the 4700U is perhaps a better comparison where the 1165G7 is slightly faster in the 7-8% range.

For this review, I'll switch from using PCMark's productivity workload to using the application workload, which unlike open source apps like LibreOffice, uses the most widely used Microsoft Office suite and Edge web browser. Given that most areas for web browsing and office apps are single-threaded, it's no surprise that Tiger Lake is the more powerful platform here.

However, the advantage in performance is only evident when the 1165G7 is allowed to consume 28W of power: In this range, the 1165G7 is 14% faster than the 4800U when the total number of applications is displayed and 22% faster than the 4700U. These numbers drop a little, to 5% and 12% respectively when compared to 15W, which is a much narrower range. As in our custom workload, Excel is the strongest result for Ryzen while PowerPoint is king at Tiger Lake.

Another lighter workload that is common with ultra-portable laptops is the compression and decompression work. This is about compression. Since the test is multithreaded, this is an area where Tiger Lake falls behind compared to Ryzen 7 processors. At 28 W, the 1165G7 is close to the Ryzen 5 Pro 4650U, while at 15 W it is slightly ahead of the 4500U. Compression isn't Zen for its strength, but the eight-core design's power and efficiency is too strong.

Decompression is particularly weak on the 1165G7 and is absolutely destroyed, especially by the SMT-capable parts in the AMD product range. The battle between Tiger Lake and the 4700U is much smaller, but the 1165G7 is still at least 25 percent slower, making Ryzen a clear choice for those who do a lot of decompression work on their laptop

On the flip side, cryptography is another lower-level task that is often critical to performance. Here, the accelerated AES-256 block from Intel is much faster than Ryzen. It's even farther from Ice Lake, on average, and offers at least 40% more performance than Ryzen laptops. This test is very memory sensitive, so the gain is higher on LPDDR4X laptops with higher bandwidth.

Exporting Acrobat PDF to Images is largely one-threaded. So it's not surprising that the 1165G7 is the fastest mobile CPU we tested. We're seeing 20% ​​better performance than the 1065G7, around the mark of our Cinebench results, which can beat Ryzen 7 by 20 to 25 percent.

Next up is Adobe Photoshop. In Puge's benchmark, which covers the most commonly used features in Photoshop, Tiger Lake is very powerful because the performance of individual threads is still the main factor in this application. As with other workloads, the gains are much higher at 28 W than at 15 W, with the 1165G7 doing 12% better than the 4700U in the higher performance class, but only 3% better at 15 W. Still, double-digit gains over Ice Lake come in handy.

We will complete the productivity workloads with our hardware accelerated benchmarks. Tiger Lake's new media engine enables a more powerful GPU to make up for the lack of CPU cores in the Puget Premiere export test – a test that is often limited to the GPU for integrated graphics. It's not a huge win for the 1165G7 as it is faster than Ryzen 7 APUs at 28W, but slower at 15W, but significantly faster than last-generation CPUs in this test. And just as a quick note, we've tested this app with the latest beta versions that fully support Ryzen APUs for hardware acceleration. So this is no longer a test where Intel executes hardware accelerated while AMD has to render on the CPU. These are correct, fair and accelerated benchmarks. Thanks to Adobe for contacting us and letting us know that they've fixed a number of longstanding bugs with Premiere on Ryzen APUs.

Where the Tiger Lake media engine can really shine is in the playback test. The 1165G7 is significantly faster than other integrated GPU solutions at 28W, and the performance is still slightly above that of the Ryzen 7 4800U at 15W.

In DaVinci Resolve's exports, there is little difference between the Ryzen 7 4800U and the Core i7-1165G7 in their higher performance classes, and the 1165G7 is only 8 percent ahead of the 4700U. At 15 W, however, the roles are reversed, with the 4700U now being the faster chip. Realistically, in a GPU-constrained test like DaVinci, you don't want to export too many files to an ultra-portable laptop APU. You can see here that the performance almost doubles once you add a decent discrete GPU to the mix like you get in the XMG Core 14, and only grows with more powerful GPUs and CPUs from then on.

And finally, we will complete the productivity tests with hardware accelerated handbrake coding using NVENC, VCE or QuickSync. The handbrake is still using part of the CPU heavily for this test. Despite a decent coding engine, the 1165G7 is CPU-limited here, with slots between the Ryzen 5 4500U and the Ryzen 5 Pro 4650U. This can be improved in a class by using a discrete Nvidia GPU which, despite the improvements made by QuickSync, still seems to hold the superior H.265 encoder.

Still, QuickSync is clearly doing a lot of work here, as the 1165G7 was only 35% slower than the 4700U with CPU coding. With hardware acceleration for both, the 1165G7 is 25% slower, which suggests that QuickSync is faster than AMD's VCE.

Gaming performance

Turning to the game, let's start with Grand Theft Auto V. Here are the results with a 15W CPU, and you'll find that the Core i7-1165G7 isn't overly competitive against Ryzen in this performance class, which is also the case fast LPDDR4X memory under the Ryzen 5 option.

At 15W, it makes sense to include a low-power, discrete GPU like the MX3250, which is significantly faster than other built-in options in this game.

At 28 W, the 1165G7 is significantly more competitive, corresponds to the Ryzen 7 4700U and 4800U and comes close to the previous discrete options of the MX250. Nvidia GPUs are still a far better choice for this game, however, as a GTX 1650 offers more than twice the frame rate in some low-setting situations.

In Civilization VI, the 1165G7 can reach the average frame rate of the Ryzen 7 4700U at 15W. This is pretty neat and shows strong progress for Intel's new Xe GPU in a game that didn't do well on Ice Lake. We see better performance than the MX250, but not quite on par with the 4800U or MX350. At 28W, the 1165G7 can flex its muscles a little more and get much closer to the 4800U, outperforming the 4700U and MX350.

In CS GO you will need an 1165G7 laptop with LPDDR4X memory as there are significant performance differences between this memory and the DDR4 configurations. With DDR4 we only see performance on par with the Ryzen 7 4700U, but with LPDDR4X, Intel is ahead of the Ryzen 7 4800U.

With 28 W, the 1165G7 is the much faster mobile platform for games in this title thanks to the performance combination of the high-frequency, fast Xe GPU from Intel and the strong single-thread performance.

Gears 5 with medium 1080p settings is very punishable for integrated GPUs. At 15 W, the Core i7-1165G7 is between the Ryzen 7 4700U and 4800U in terms of performance. However, at 25W, the Intel processor is much faster and offers a 15% higher average frame rate than the 4800U, even when using the slower DDR4 memory option. It's also faster than Nvidia's MX350.

Similar story in F1 2019. At 15W, the 1165G7 ranks between the Ryzen 7 4700U and 4800U in terms of performance, although it requires LPDDR4X memory to get there. Neither product is the same as Nvidia's MX350. With 25 W, especially with LPDDR4X memory, Intel is clearly the faster option with a lead of around 20% over the 4800U and Nvidia MX350.

And finally, we come to Rainbow Six Siege at 1080p center settings, where the 1165G7 delivers a truly playable experience around the 60 FPS mark at 28W, well ahead of AMD's best Ryzen 7 APUs. This lead also applies to 15 W, although DDR4 only poses an obstacle to Intel’s integrated GPU performance with LPDDR4X memory, as the memory bandwidth is far less.

Benchmarks

The combination of these data points for games suggests that the Core i7-1165G7 in the higher performance class with LPDDR4X memory is around the mark of the Ryzen 7 4800U in the worst case and 30% faster or more in the best case. DDR4 configurations will be worse. Then Tiger Lake is not as efficient at 15W and will likely be somewhere between 4700U and 4800U, which is still a very competitive result for Intel all in all.

The Core i7-1165G7 is a major improvement on the Core i7-1065G7 with a higher power configuration of 28W / 25W, especially for designs where both have the same number of cores. Intel offers 20% better multi-thread performance and 30% better single-thread performance on some workloads, as well as a much faster GPU.

At 15W, the margins are much tighter, with 15% better single-thread performance and 10% better multi-thread performance on typical workloads. That's still a win, but it does suggest that Intel's 10nm SuperFin is optimized for 28W power classes versus 15W. This can also be seen in Intel's own graphics, which compare Sunny Cove and Willow Cove, where the gap between these designs increases as the voltage increases.

So in the end, we have a pretty big difference between 15W and 28W configurations. Even with single-threaded workloads, gains are made as reaching this 4.8 GHz mark requires more than 15W on a single core.

When comparing the 1165G7 to the most widely used Ryzen 7 4700U processor from AMD, these parts are off the shelf. AMD's design is faster for multi-threaded performance, which is often significant given the discrepancy between the core numbers. However, the 1165G7 is up to 25% faster for single-threaded workloads. This results in better performance in areas like Office applications and Photoshop. The 1165G7 is also faster for hardware acceleration like in Premiere or DaVinci. In the lower performance class, however, the gap between Tiger Lake and the 4700U is narrowing, and AMD can occasionally take a few wins.

The situation is similar with the 1165G7 against AMD's flagship Ryzen 7 4800U. The 4800U's lead in multi-core testing grows significantly with the addition of SMT. However, the 1165G7 is still the faster processor for single-threaded tasks and accelerated workloads. Even at 15W, the margins are more for AMD, but Intel is still able to perform better on some key workloads.

What we learned

The Core i7-1165G7 is one of the better CPUs from Intel that has hit the market in the last 5 years. Both Intel desktop and mobile CPU offerings have been stagnating for some time, especially on the desktop side. In all areas of the CPU division, however, criticism was raised. The Core i7-1165G7 offers the greatest advantages over previous generations since the Kaby Lake Refresh, in which Intel's mobile U-series has been expanded from 2 to 4 cores.

With significant improvements in all areas of the chip, Intel was able to significantly increase the CPU frequencies compared to Ice Lake with 10 nm SuperFin. This results in much better single-thread and multi-thread performance for the same voltage level. The Xe GPU is even better and offers a huge leap in performance on the 1065G7. This is complemented by a number of strong platform features such as Thunderbolt, PCIe 4.0 and improvements to the media engine and other areas.

The gains over Ice Lake are most notorious in the higher powered configuration, which is 28W for this generation. It's clear why Intel has put more focus on this TDP configuration, as the 1165G7 is nowhere near as impressive at 15W. In some cases, Intel needs the extra power to beat Zen 2-based Ryzen, with AMD's APUs generally being more efficient for systems with lower power consumption at 15W.

In the battle between Tiger Lake and Ryzen Renoir, the number of CPU cores is the issue that keeps popping up. AMD fans love Intel because they only make a quad-core design for ultraportables compared to AMD's eight cores. However, this is unfair to Intel in our opinion, as the Core i7-1165G7 has other strengths that are very relevant to thin and light laptops.

For most of the simple, everyday, and lighter tasks that buyers typically do with an ultra-portable laptop, Intel offers better performance. Thanks to the much higher single-thread performance, the Core i7-1165G7 is faster than the Ryzen 7 4700U or 4800U in terms of web browsing, app loading, office productivity, photo editing in Photoshop, and even some accelerated coding work . These are most of the core workloads for an ultra-portable laptop design. We mean, in general, you wouldn't do CPU based rendering on a laptop, while this is a more relevant test on a desktop.

How much faster than AMD? This depends on the workload, the power configuration and the Ryzen CPU in question. In short, we've seen 10 to 20 percent more performance in these apps, which is a decent difference.

AMD is able to narrow that margin when it comes to 15W designs where the Core i7-1165G7 competes against the Ryzen 7 4800U. Unfortunately, the 4800U is a rare animal for AMD. Intel will be competing against the far more common Ryzen 7 4700U (which is still relatively hard to come by even with delivery restrictions), and the 1165G7 can go further than that design.

With Tiger Lake, Intel was able to add more integrated gaming performance to its daily workload package, especially at higher TDPs. If most of what you do on your laptop includes surfing the web, office app productivity, photo editing, and a bit of light gaming, the Core i7-1165G7 is the better mobile processor. We suspect that this will cover a large segment of ultraportable laptop buyers. Intel would like to be able to offer 8 cores, but they don't really need them to be competitive.

On the flip side, 8-core Ryzen 7 APUs are much faster for any heavier job with a limited multithreaded CPU. AMD is over 50% faster in multithreaded tests, making a 4700U or 4800U better if the apps you are using hit many CPU cores. People who need a portable laptop for code compilation, compression, data processing in Excel, or CPU-based video encoding should turn to Ryzen. And if you're specifically looking for an ultra-thin 13-inch design that runs on 15W, you can get a few more wins too like in Premiere and some games.

This brings us back to something we said in our Ryzen 4000 reviews. AMD is currently able to deliver transformative performance for ultraportables, converting previous 45W H-series power, which required bulkier laptops, into thin and light designs. Intel's offerings are not on the same level there.

Ultimately, it comes down to how you use your laptop and what matters most to you. There isn't a single "best" choice for an ultra-portable laptop between the Core i7-1165G7 and a Ryzen 7 APU, and of course other factors like design and budget have to be considered.

Needless to say, our primary focus during this review was performance. We haven't discussed other aspects of the platform – especially battery life. Getting more power at the same level of performance generally translates into longer battery life. Sie sagt jedoch nicht viel über den Leerlauf aus. Sie sollten sich bestimmte Laptop-Testberichte ansehen, da diese je nach Kapazität und Konfiguration von Modell zu Modell sehr unterschiedlich sein können.

Intel genießt ein ausgereifteres Laptop-Ökosystem. Während Ryzen 4000 ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung für das Unternehmen war, gibt es immer noch wenige ultradünne Premium-AMD-Designs, während Intel in großen High-End-Laptops fast aller Marken verwendet wird, denken Sie an Dell XPS, Razer Blade, HP Spectre und so weiter auf.

Last but not least hören wir laute Geräusche über AMD Zen 3 APUs, die nicht weit entfernt sind. Wir können wahrscheinlich davon ausgehen, dass diese im ersten Quartal 2021 auftauchen werden. Obwohl Tiger Lake heute die überlegene Plattform für Single-Thread- und GPU-Leistung ist, könnte sich dies in einigen Monaten ändern, da wir wissen, was von Zen 3 danach zu erwarten ist Verwenden Sie es auf der Desktop-Seite.

Einkaufsverknüpfungen
  • Intel Core i7-1165G7 Tiger Lake Laptops bei Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-1185G7 Tiger Lake Laptops bei Amazon
  • Ryzen 7 4800U Laptops bei Amazon
  • Ryzen 7 4700U Laptops bei Amazon
  • Ryzen 9 4900HS Laptops bei Amazon

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *